I see the problem: you have to buy the "Advanced Version" to get CSV format output.Īnd for Superposition, that doesn't include it, you need to get the very expensive "Professional Version" at a whopping $995 to get CSV output.Īlthough I guess if you agree to submit the Superposition benchmark to them online, you could then go to the website and get the output from that. I think it might be better just to use the values from the TPU GPU Database for anthing except where GPU-Z was run.Īnd please don't take this as destructive criticism of your great effort in compiling the lists.īut this is why these benchmarks are not compiled anywhere else, as you have done: it's just too much hassle. Not your fault: unless they ran GPU-Z, it's hard to tell.īut I think one cannot rely on about 80% of the values for GPU or Memory speeds. I was looking at the GPU-Z reports where done, as well as what people reported if they didn't run these.Īnd it's very confusing about what speeds are to be reported in the compilation summary. So in all cases, the dominant GPU is the AMD Radeon R9 280(x). It just uses the fancier and more power hungry one on demand: which would be 100% of the time when running a demanding game, or benchmark like Heaven. Maybe more: these were all I saw in your list.Īs I understand it, where the CPU has an integrated GPU, and there's a standalone one as well, it never uses BOTH. I think they should be noted as SINGLE GPU: (1) One comment about a few cases where the entries are recorded as Multi GPU's.
Quadro k2200 unigine heaven benchmark how to#
And is quite an effort: not many people listened to how to run the test, or report the data.:-}Ĭouple comments about the data in the compiled lists:
0 kommentar(er)
